August 27th, 2007
by: John Tang
This past Monday, I had an opportunity to talk to a guy named Fabio while I was EVing. We had a pretty long conversation basically centered on truth; he had already heard the gospel message from his mom, and although I was able to share it in brief during our conversation, he seemed very adamant in his own views. Fabio was basically opposed to any form of organized religion because of its structure and rigidity, which he felt hindered the individual person from having his or her own personal experience. He was, on the contrary, all about the personal experience of spirituality. This experience, to him, superseded any doctrinal or theological affiliations. Our ultimate goal, in his opinion, is to have some form of personal spiritual experience, whether it is through Christianity or Buddhism or even an individual creation of deity that you choose. In the end, he believed that it’s what you experience that’s true, since it’s an experience that is real and true to you. Truth, then, is whatever is perceived through the eyes of man.
After hearing him share much of his own testimony about his progress through religion and asking some questions, we proceeded to talk about the idea of truth itself. Our conversation ranged from various topics such as: nature, Christ, the apostles, the Bible, and personal experiences. What I tried to emphasize to him was that truth exists apart from the individual and therefore must be examined apart from the opinion of the multitudes as well the personal experiences of the individual; in the end, the Truth exists apart from any beliefs that we can conceive on our own.
Our conversation basically ended with him telling me that he’s heard the gospel from his mom and he doesn’t want to hear it or believe in it. While he did say that he saw good things in Christianity, in the end, he was adamant about that the pursuit of personal truth and the experience of finding this truth hold absolute weight.
I do agree to some extant with what Fabio said about the lack of personal experience within structured religion. The lack of a personal testimony for believers who have either been raised in the church or gone to church mindlessly has left these same believers without life in their worship to God because they feel like they can’t personally relate to the work of God. In fact, there are reminders in the Old Testament for Israel and even in the New Testament for believers to remember the work that God has personally done for them. After explaining the work of Christ in saving the Gentiles, Paul commands the Gentile believers in Ephesus to “remember that you were at that time separate from Christ… having no hope and without God in the world. But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far off have been brought bear by the blood of Christ” (Ephesians 2:12-13). It’s often when we remember the work that God did in our lives that we grow a more personal love for Him; all Christians need a testimony, and Fabio is right in talking about the need for a personal experience.
However, what doesn’t sit right with me is that Fabio placed such a high value on this personal experience that he was willing to diminish the existence of any absolute truth for the sake of experience. He essentially placed emotions above truth. So you can believe anything you want, as long as you have a spiritual experience or emotion about it. While that does solve the problem of the emptiness felt by many today who have never had any personal experience with Christ, this is ultimately a solution that will never fully satisfy. We’ll always hunger for more spirituality and emotional experiences until we finally come to the true source of spiritual life. “The sorrows of those who run after another god shall multiply” (Psalm 16:4).